The strive for unity both by worldly and ecclesiastical powers
led to the big schism within the Russian orthodox church, the "Raskol"
After Russia had managed its big crisis in the Times of Turmoil which almost led to its decomposition, and had elected and inthroned a new tsar, the first Romanov tsar, Mikhail Fyodorovitch, the question of how to go on with the church was unresolved. Michail’s father Filaret was elected patriarch of the Rus’, but rather acted as a wordly regent beside his son. In the last years of Mikhail’s reign a council of church reformers was formed who in Russian historiography are called the "adherers of devoutness", founded by the personal priest and advisor of the new tsar "gentle Alexei". From this group emerged the man who was to both split and unite the Russian Church, Nikon.
wanted to unify the church in its dogms and liturgy. Among other things he fell back on certain rules or habits from the Greek legacy. As it has been established later, he also took the contemporary Greek liturgy of his times as a model for his reforms. These reforms of the patriarch led to a big protest from clerics and believers all over the country who declined to accept these changes which they considered heresy and a breach with the "real belief" they claimed to profess.
It is generally assumed nowadays that most of those people rejected first of all the strive for centralization and unification as a threat to their independence, and had lesser purely religious objections. But it also influenced the relation between serfs and their feudal lords. Many serfs felt that their inferior condition (that also had been established and codified shortly before, in the time of Boris Godunov) would be established even more gravely by this reform, and they fled from their dependency.
Also within the church resistance persisted. Among the most famous "splitters" (raskolniki) were the monks of the very prestigious Solovyetski monastry in the north, on an island in the White Sea – the monastery where Nikon himself had started his career as a monk. Their position as one of the most traditional and respected monastries of Russia was too delicate to summon them all to court or extinguish them. So they were simply excluded from the Russian Patriarchate, and fell into disgrace.
It has been established by the Russian Orthodox Church in the 20th century that Nikon was not authorized to condemn those who didnt follow his instructions and that that the condemnations of the "heretics", those not willing to adjust to the new rules, are null and void. The "Old Believers" have thus been rehabilitated and reaccepted into the church. Still they insist on forming an own confession and elect own leaders.
From my lecture on the internet I found out that some adherents of the Russian Orthodox Church still defend the Nikonian reforms against the "Old Believers". They are quarreling with each other partially on the internet.
back to main page